Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the fixed-dose dual bronchodilator combination tiotropium–olodaterol for patients with COPD in the Netherlands

PURPOSE: The fixed-dose dual bronchodilator combination (FDC) of tiotropium and olodaterol showed increased effectiveness regarding lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared with the use of its mono-components. Yet, while effectiveness and safety have been shown, the health economic implication of this treatment is still unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-utility and budget impact of tiotropium-olodaterol FDC in patients with moderate to very severe COPD in the Netherlands. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A... Mehr ...

Verfasser: van Boven, Job Fm
Kocks, Janwillem Wh
Postma, Maarten J
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2016
Reihe/Periodikum: van Boven , J F , Kocks , J W & Postma , M J 2016 , ' Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the fixed-dose dual bronchodilator combination tiotropium–olodaterol for patients with COPD in the Netherlands ' , International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease , vol. 11 , no. 1 , pp. 2191-2201 . https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S114738
Schlagwörter: Budget impact / COPD / Cost-effectiveness / Cost–utility / Health economics / olodaterol plus tiotropium bromide / tiotropium bromide / age distribution / article / chronic obstructive lung disease / cost effectiveness analysis / disease duration / disease exacerbation / disease severity / drug cost / forced expiratory volume / health care cost / human / medication compliance / Netherlands / quality adjusted life year / sex difference / survival rate / treatment duration / treatment outcome
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26826287
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://hdl.handle.net/11370/b573c5db-77f5-494f-9b40-5f00b0f9f69a

PURPOSE: The fixed-dose dual bronchodilator combination (FDC) of tiotropium and olodaterol showed increased effectiveness regarding lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared with the use of its mono-components. Yet, while effectiveness and safety have been shown, the health economic implication of this treatment is still unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the cost-utility and budget impact of tiotropium-olodaterol FDC in patients with moderate to very severe COPD in the Netherlands. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cost-utility study was performed, using an individual-level Markov model. To populate the model, individual patient-level data (age, height, sex, COPD duration, baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second) were obtained from the tiotropium-olodaterol TOnado trial. In the model, forced expiratory volume in 1 second and patient-level data were extrapolated to utility and survival, and treatment with tiotropium-olodaterol FDC was compared with tiotropium. Cost-utility analysis was performed from the Dutch health care payer's perspective using a 15-year time horizon in the base-case analysis. The standard Dutch discount rates were applied (costs: 4.0%; effects: 1.5%). Both univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Budget impact was annually assessed over a 5-year time horizon, taking into account different levels of medication adherence. RESULTS: As a result of cost increases, combined with quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gains, results showed that tiotropium-olodaterol FDC had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €7,004/QALY. Without discounting, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €5,981/QALY. Results were robust in univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Budget impact was estimated at €4.3 million over 5 years assuming 100% medication adherence. Scenarios with 40%, 60%, and 80% adherence resulted in lower 5-year incremental cost increases of €1.7, €2.6, and €3.4 million, ...