Once-weekly semaglutide for patients with type 2 diabetes:a cost-effectiveness analysis in the Netherlands

Objective Choosing therapies for type 2 diabetes that are both effective and cost-effective is vital as healthcare systems worldwide aim to maximize health of the population. The present analysis assessed the cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide (a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist) versus insulin glargine U100 (the most commonly used basal insulin) and versus dulaglutide (an alternative once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist), from a societal perspective in the Netherlands. Research design and methods The IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model was used to project outcomes for onc... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Hunt, Barnaby
Malkin, Samuel J. P.
Moes, Robert G. J.
Huisman, Eline L.
Vandebrouck, Tom
Wolffenbuttel, Bruce H. R.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2019
Reihe/Periodikum: Hunt , B , Malkin , S J P , Moes , R G J , Huisman , E L , Vandebrouck , T & Wolffenbuttel , B H R 2019 , ' Once-weekly semaglutide for patients with type 2 diabetes : a cost-effectiveness analysis in the Netherlands ' , BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care , vol. 7 , no. 1 , 000705 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000705
Schlagwörter: MULTIFACTORIAL INTERVENTION / CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES / OPEN-LABEL / COMPLICATIONS / LIXISENATIDE / LIRAGLUTIDE / MELLITUS / SULFONYLUREAS / VALIDATION / MODEL
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26826205
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://hdl.handle.net/11370/aeecdf30-6d65-41cf-8b5e-896b7d20af61

Objective Choosing therapies for type 2 diabetes that are both effective and cost-effective is vital as healthcare systems worldwide aim to maximize health of the population. The present analysis assessed the cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide (a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist) versus insulin glargine U100 (the most commonly used basal insulin) and versus dulaglutide (an alternative once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist), from a societal perspective in the Netherlands. Research design and methods The IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model was used to project outcomes for once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg versus insulin glargine U100, once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg, and once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. Clinical data were taken from the SUSTAIN 4 and SUSTAIN 7 clinical trials. The analysis captured direct and indirect costs, mortality, and the impact of diabetes-related complications on quality of life. Results Projections of outcomes suggested that once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg was associated with improved quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.19 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus insulin glargine U100 and 0.07 QALYs versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg. Once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg was associated with mean increases in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.27 QALYs versus insulin glargine U100 and 0.13 QALYs versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. Improvements came at an increased cost versus insulin glargine U100, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from a societal perspective of _4988 and _495 per QALY gained for once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, respectively, falling below Netherlands-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds. Improvements versus dulaglutide came at a reduced cost from a societal perspective for both doses of once-weekly semaglutide. Conclusions Once-weekly semaglutide is cost-effective versus insulin glargine U100, and dominant versus dulaglutide 0.75 and 1.5 mg for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, and represents a good ...