BACKGROUND: Home telemonitoring in heart failure (HF) patients may reduce workload of HF nurses by reducing face-to-face contacts. The aim of this study is to assess whether telemonitoring as a substitution could have negative effects as expressed by less reduction in circulating natriuretic peptide levels between baseline and one-year of follow up compared to usual care. METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of the e-Vita HF trial, a three-arm parallel randomized trial conducted in stable HF patients. Patients were randomized into three arms: (i) usual HF outpatient care, (ii) usual care combined with the use of the website heartfailurematters.org, and (iii) telemonitoring (e-Vita HF platform) instead of face-to-face consultations. Mixed linear model analyses were applied to assess differences in the N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels between the three arms over a year. RESULTS: A total of 223 participants could be included (mean age 67.1 ± 10.1 years, 27% women, New York Heart Association class I–IV; 39%, 38%, 14%, and 9%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 35 ± 10%. The median of routine face-to-face contacts over a year was 1.0 lower (2.0 vs. 3.0) in the third arm compared with usual care. Median NT-proBNP levels did not significantly differ between the three arms. CONCLUSION: In stable and optimally treated HF patients, telemonitoring causing a reduction of routine face-to-face contacts seems not to negatively affect hemodynamic status as measured by NT-proBNP levels over time.