Priority to end of life treatments? Views of the public in the Netherlands

Objectives Recent debates in the Netherlands on health care priority setting have focused on the relative value of gains generated by life-extending medicines for people with a terminal illness, mostly new cancer drugs. These treatments are generally expensive, provide relatively small health gains, and therefore usually do not meet common cost per QALY thresholds. Nevertheless, these drugs may be provided under the assumption that there is public support for making a special case for treatments for people with a terminal illness. This study investigated the views of the public in the Netherla... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Wouters, Sofie
van Exel, Job
Baker, Rachel
Brouwer, Werner B.F.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2017
Reihe/Periodikum: Wouters , S , van Exel , J , Baker , R & Brouwer , W B F 2017 , ' Priority to end of life treatments? Views of the public in the Netherlands ' , Value in Health , vol. 20 , no. 1 , pp. 107-117 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.544
Schlagwörter: end of life treatments / health economics / Q methodology / social values / Netherlands / /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_being / SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26805816
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://researchonline.gcu.ac.uk/en/publications/1d5317cb-9364-4b92-bde9-542c1681511d