Partitioning the etiology of hoarding and obsessive–compulsive symptoms

BackgroundUntil recently, hoarding was considered an obsessive-compulsive symptom (OCS). However, current evidence suggests that these two phenotypes may be clinically, and perhaps etiologically, distinct. Both hoarding and OCS have a genetic etiology, but the degree of unique and shared genetic contributions to these phenotypes has not been well studied.MethodPrevalence rates were assessed for hoarding and OCS in a sample of adult twin pairs (n = 7906 twins) and their family members from The Netherlands Twin Register (total sample = 15,914). Using Mplus, genetic analyses using liability thres... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Mathews, CA
Delucchi, K
Cath, DC
Willemsen, G
Boomsma, DI
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2014
Reihe/Periodikum: Psychological Medicine, vol 44, iss 13
Verlag/Hrsg.: eScholarship
University of California
Schlagwörter: Biological Psychology / Psychology / Genetics / Human Genome / Adult / Female / Hoarding Disorder / Humans / Male / Middle Aged / Netherlands / Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder / Registries / heritability / hoarding / obsessive-compulsive / twins / Neurosciences / Public Health and Health Services / Psychiatry / Clinical sciences / Clinical and health psychology
Sprache: unknown
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26791810
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://escholarship.org/uc/item/008225js

BackgroundUntil recently, hoarding was considered an obsessive-compulsive symptom (OCS). However, current evidence suggests that these two phenotypes may be clinically, and perhaps etiologically, distinct. Both hoarding and OCS have a genetic etiology, but the degree of unique and shared genetic contributions to these phenotypes has not been well studied.MethodPrevalence rates were assessed for hoarding and OCS in a sample of adult twin pairs (n = 7906 twins) and their family members from The Netherlands Twin Register (total sample = 15,914). Using Mplus, genetic analyses using liability threshold models were conducted for both phenotypes, for their co-morbidity, and for specific hoarding symptoms (cluttering, discarding and acquiring).ResultsOf the total sample, 6.7% met criteria for clinically significant hoarding; endorsement of all three hoarding symptoms was > or = 79%. Men had slightly higher rates than women. Also, 5.7% met criteria for clinically significant OCS; rates were similar in males and females. Genetic factors accounted for 36% of the variance for hoarding and 40% of the variance for OCS. The genetic correlation between hoarding and OCS was 0.10. There was no evidence of sex-specific genetic contributions for hoarding or OCS. There was evidence for a genetic contribution to all hoarding symptom subtypes. Only cluttering showed evidence of a contribution from the shared environment.ConclusionsOCS and hoarding are common in this population-based sample, have prevalence rates similar to those previously reported, and show significant heritability. Genetic factors contributed to the co-morbidity of both traits, although the genetic correlation between them was low.