Concernaansprakelijkheid. Rechtsvergelijkende en internationaal privaatrechtelijke beschouwingen
The comparative part of the study serves two purposes. The first is a purpose which is common to all comparative studies. In order to judge national law on its merits one has to look at the solutions provide by other legal systems. The second- more specific- purpose of the comparative study is that it enables the author to assess the possibilities of harmonisation of the rules concerning group liability in the EU. The assessment departs from the proposals which were recently put forward by the Forum Europaeum Konzernrecht, an international working group of leading experts in the field of group... Mehr ...
| Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumenttyp: | doctoralThesis |
| Erscheinungsdatum: | 1999 |
| Verlag/Hrsg.: |
Kluwer
|
| Schlagwörter: | Proefschriften (vorm) / Rechtsvergelijking (vorm) / Civielrechtelijke aansprakelijkheid / Concerns / Houdstermaat / Engeland / Nederland / Duitsland / internationaal privaatrecht 4.220 België / vennootschapsrecht |
| Sprache: | Niederländisch |
| Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26763905 |
| Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
| Powered By: | BASE |
| Link(s) : | http://hdl.handle.net/11370/d2103e04-a631-4f4b-94ba-e8464088bbe7 |
The comparative part of the study serves two purposes. The first is a purpose which is common to all comparative studies. In order to judge national law on its merits one has to look at the solutions provide by other legal systems. The second- more specific- purpose of the comparative study is that it enables the author to assess the possibilities of harmonisation of the rules concerning group liability in the EU. The assessment departs from the proposals which were recently put forward by the Forum Europaeum Konzernrecht, an international working group of leading experts in the field of group law. . Zie: Summary.