Annual Survey of Virginia Law: Property Law

Both the Virginia Supreme Court and the General Assembly addressed important issues affecting property law in Virginia over the past year. For instance, the Virginia Supreme Court considered for the first time the extent to which dominant estate owners could improve rights of way benefiting their property. The General Assembly has gone a long way toward vitiating the long held caveat emptor rule predominant in Virginia by adopting a residential sales disclosure statute. These and other important cases and statutes are discussed below.

Verfasser: Rothenberg, Charles H.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 1992
Reihe/Periodikum: University of Richmond Law Review
Verlag/Hrsg.: UR Scholarship Repository
Schlagwörter: McLeskey v. Ocean Park Investors / Allen v. Chapman / Garrison v. First Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n / Princess Anne Hills Civic League v. Susan Constant Real Estate Trust / Holly Hill Farm Corp. v. Rowe / Hayes v. Aquia Marina / Edmonton Homes v. McKinney Group / Davis v. Cleve Marsh Hunt Club / Lamar Corp v. City of Richmond / Richardson v. Richardson / Pitts v. United States / Funches v. Funches / Sentara Enterprises v. CCP Associates / Walker v. Arrington / United States v. Southern Management Corp / James T. Bush Construction Co v. Patel / Addington-Beaman Lumber Co v. Lincoln Savings and Loan Ass'n / Whitby v. Overton / Tiller v. Owen / City of Virginia Beach v. ESG Enterprises / Holland v. Johnson / Carmel v. City of Hampton / Board of Zoning Appeals v. Glasser Brothers Corp / Friends of Clark Mountain Foundation v. Board of Supervisors of Orange County / Property Law and Real Estate
Sprache: unknown
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26725883
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://scholarship.richmond.edu/lawreview/vol26/iss4/16