The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient's opinion favours single-port laparoscopy

INTRODUCTION: Single-port laparoscopy is prospected as the future of minimal invasive surgery. It is hypothesised to cause less post operative pain, with a shorter hospitalisation period and improved cosmetic results. Population- and patient-based opinion is important for the adaptation of new techniques. This study aimed to assess the opinion and perception of a healthy population and a patient population on single-port laparoscopy compared with conventional laparoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous 33-item questionnaire, describing conventional and single-port laparoscopy, was given t... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Fransen, S. A.
Broeders, E.
Stassen, L.
Bouvy, N.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2014
Reihe/Periodikum: Fransen , S A , Broeders , E , Stassen , L & Bouvy , N 2014 , ' The voice of Holland: Dutch public and patient's opinion favours single-port laparoscopy ' , Journal of minimal access surgery , vol. 10 , no. 3 , pp. 119-125 . https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.134874
Schlagwörter: NOTES / single-port laparoscopy / questionnaire / TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY / CHOLECYSTECTOMY / REVOLUTION
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26719056
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/62dcd214-fa0a-4e12-86fe-8ab19b22ab28

INTRODUCTION: Single-port laparoscopy is prospected as the future of minimal invasive surgery. It is hypothesised to cause less post operative pain, with a shorter hospitalisation period and improved cosmetic results. Population- and patient-based opinion is important for the adaptation of new techniques. This study aimed to assess the opinion and perception of a healthy population and a patient population on single-port laparoscopy compared with conventional laparoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymous 33-item questionnaire, describing conventional and single-port laparoscopy, was given to 101 patients and 104 healthy volunteers. The survey participants (median age 44 years; range 17-82 years) were asked questions about their personal situation and their expectations and perceptions of the two different surgical techniques; conventional multi-port laparoscopy and single-port laparoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 72% of the participants had never heard of single-port laparoscopy before. The most important concern in both groups was the risk of surgical complications. When complication risks remain similar, 80% prefers single-port laparoscopy to conventional laparoscopy. When the risk of complications increases from 1% to 10%, 43% of all participants prefer single-port laparoscopy. A total of 70% of the participants are prepared to receive treatment in another hospital if single-port surgery is not performed in their hometown hospital. The preference for single-port approach was higher in the female population. CONCLUSION: Although cure and safety remain the main concerns, the population and patients group have a favourable perception of single-port surgery. The impact of public opinion and patient perception towards innovative techniques is undeniable. If the safety of the two different procedures is similar, this study shows a positive attitude of both participant groups in favour of single-port laparoscopy. However, solid scientific proof for the safety and feasibility of this new surgical technique needs to be ...