Business and human rights implications of climate change litigation: Milieudefensie et al . v Royal Dutch Shell

Abstract In Milieudefensie et al. v Royal Dutch Shell , the District Court in the Hague ordered the respondent company to cut its global carbon dioxide emissions by 45 percent by 2030, as compared with 2019 levels. The landmark judgement represents the first imposition of a specific mitigation obligation on a private company over and above reduction targets set by existing ‘cap‐and‐trade’ regulations and/or other governmental mitigation policies. In interpreting Royal Dutch Shell's duty of care under Dutch tort law, the Court referred extensively to international soft law, including the United... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Macchi, Chiara
van Zeben, Josephine
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2021
Reihe/Periodikum: Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law ; volume 30, issue 3, page 409-415 ; ISSN 2050-0386 2050-0394
Verlag/Hrsg.: Wiley
Schlagwörter: Law / Management / Monitoring / Policy and Law / Geography / Planning and Development / General Medicine
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26690869
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/reel.12416

Abstract In Milieudefensie et al. v Royal Dutch Shell , the District Court in the Hague ordered the respondent company to cut its global carbon dioxide emissions by 45 percent by 2030, as compared with 2019 levels. The landmark judgement represents the first imposition of a specific mitigation obligation on a private company over and above reduction targets set by existing ‘cap‐and‐trade’ regulations and/or other governmental mitigation policies. In interpreting Royal Dutch Shell's duty of care under Dutch tort law, the Court referred extensively to international soft law, including the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. This note considers the implications of this case for corporate responsibility for environmental and human rights.