Dutch Supreme Court 2012: Virtual Theft Ruling a One-Off or First in a Series?

In January 2012 the Dutch Supreme Court decided that virtual objects and pre-paid accounts can be stolen. This paper examines the Supreme Court’s Runescape decision and discusses virtual theft. Virtual theft is legally interesting from various perspectives. First, the rules of Runescape do not allow items to be stolen and are designed to make illegal transfer of objects impossible. Second, normally a person loses ownership of property in case of theft, but the owner of the virtual objects is the producer of the game and loses nothing. Therefore, theft is taking place between two avatars under... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Lodder, A.R.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2013
Reihe/Periodikum: Lodder , A R 2013 , ' Dutch Supreme Court 2012: Virtual Theft Ruling a One-Off or First in a Series? ' , Journal of Virtual Worlds Research , vol. 6 , no. 3 , pp. 1-12 .
Schlagwörter: /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/peace_justice_and_strong_institutions / name=SDG 16 - Peace / Justice and Strong Institutions
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26686263
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/07e3322d-ab6b-4a5f-8e34-e1b341911583