What does the EU actually mean to citizens?:An in-depth study of Dutch citizens' understandings and evaluations of the European Union

Although citizens' attitudes towards the European Union (EU) have been examined extensively, there is a dearth of studies on what the EU actually means to them. Inspired by observations suggesting that the EU means different things to different people, this research aimed to uncover these views using an inductive approach: 13 group interviews with a heterogenous set of homogenous groups. 45 Dutch citizens, strategically selected from various social backgrounds, were interviewed in-depth. Four discourses on the EU were identified: pragmatic, federalist, anti-establishment and disengaged. We als... Mehr ...

Verfasser: van den Hoogen, Elske
de Koster, Willem
van der Waal, Jeroen
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2022
Reihe/Periodikum: van den Hoogen , E , de Koster , W & van der Waal , J 2022 , ' What does the EU actually mean to citizens? An in-depth study of Dutch citizens' understandings and evaluations of the European Union ' , Journal of Common Market Studies (JCMS) , vol. 60 , no. 5 , pp. 1432-1448 . https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13314
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26684742
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://pure.eur.nl/en/publications/cdab53be-c40e-40f5-bf6d-c2420b40fd96

Although citizens' attitudes towards the European Union (EU) have been examined extensively, there is a dearth of studies on what the EU actually means to them. Inspired by observations suggesting that the EU means different things to different people, this research aimed to uncover these views using an inductive approach: 13 group interviews with a heterogenous set of homogenous groups. 45 Dutch citizens, strategically selected from various social backgrounds, were interviewed in-depth. Four discourses on the EU were identified: pragmatic, federalist, anti-establishment and disengaged. We also demonstrated that these discourses go hand-in-hand with: 1) specific evaluations of the EU beyond the conventional ‘Europhilia-Euroscepticism’ dimension; and 2) similar criticisms regarding themes emphasised by interviewees themselves – wasting of money and a lack of transparency and democracy – but for very different, sometimes even counterposing, reasons. The wider implications of our findings and possible venues for further research are also discussed.