How is atrial fibrillation detected in everyday healthcare? Results of a Dutch cohort study

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia with serious potential consequences when left untreated. For timely treatment, early detection is imperative. We explored how new AF is detected in patients aged ≥ 65 years in Dutch healthcare. Methods The study cohort consisted of 9526 patients from 49 Dutch general practices in the usual-care arm of the Detecting and Diagnosing Atrial Fibrillation study. We automatically extracted data from the electronic medical records and reviewed individual records of patients who developed AF. Patient selection started in 2015, and data... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Verbiest-van Gurp, N.
Uittenbogaart, S. B.
van de Moosdijk, S. C. M.
van Sprang, U. F.
Knottnerus, J. A.
Stoffers, H. E. J. H.
Lucassen, W. A. M.
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2022
Reihe/Periodikum: Netherlands Heart Journal ; volume 31, issue 2, page 76-82 ; ISSN 1568-5888 1876-6250
Verlag/Hrsg.: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Schlagwörter: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26681869
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-022-01719-2

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia with serious potential consequences when left untreated. For timely treatment, early detection is imperative. We explored how new AF is detected in patients aged ≥ 65 years in Dutch healthcare. Methods The study cohort consisted of 9526 patients from 49 Dutch general practices in the usual-care arm of the Detecting and Diagnosing Atrial Fibrillation study. We automatically extracted data from the electronic medical records and reviewed individual records of patients who developed AF. Patient selection started in 2015, and data collection ended in 2019. Results We included 258 patients with newly diagnosed AF. In 55.0% of the patients, the irregular heartbeat was first observed in general practice and in 16.3% in the cardiology department. Cardiologists diagnosed most cases (47.3%), followed by general practitioners (GPs; 33.7%). AF detection was triggered by symptoms in 64.7% of the patients and by previous stroke in 3.5%. Overall, patients aged 65–74 years more often presented with symptoms than those aged ≥ 75 years (73.5% vs 60.6%; p = 0.042). In 31.5% of the patients, AF was diagnosed incidentally (‘silent AF’). Silent-AF patients were on average 2 years older than symptomatic-AF patients. GPs less often diagnosed silent AF than symptomatic AF (21.0% vs 39.0%; p = 0.008), whereas physicians other than GPs or cardiologists more often diagnosed symptomatic AF than silent AF (34.6% vs 11.9%; p < 0.001). Most diagnoses were based on a 12-lead electrocardiogram (93.8%). Conclusion Diagnosing AF is a multidisciplinary process. The irregular heartbeat was most often detected by the GP, but cardiologists diagnosed most cases. One-third of all newly diagnosed AF was silent.