What textbooks offer and what teachers teach: an analysis of the Dutch reading comprehension curriculum

Abstract In the Netherlands, the quality of the reading curriculum is currently under debate because of disappointing results on national and international assessments of students’ reading skills and motivation. In a mixed-method study, we analyzed the content of Dutch textbooks for reading comprehension instruction (i.e., the implemented curriculum) and teachers’ evaluation and use of these books (i.e., the enacted curriculum). A materials analysis of reading comprehension lessons (N = 80) in eight textbooks for grades 4 and 5 was complemented with semi-structured teacher interviews (N = 29)... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Bogaerds-Hazenberg, Suzanne T. M.
Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline
van den Bergh, Huub
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2022
Reihe/Periodikum: Reading and Writing ; volume 35, issue 7, page 1497-1523 ; ISSN 0922-4777 1573-0905
Verlag/Hrsg.: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Schlagwörter: Speech and Hearing / Linguistics and Language / Education / Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26679715
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10244-4

Abstract In the Netherlands, the quality of the reading curriculum is currently under debate because of disappointing results on national and international assessments of students’ reading skills and motivation. In a mixed-method study, we analyzed the content of Dutch textbooks for reading comprehension instruction (i.e., the implemented curriculum) and teachers’ evaluation and use of these books (i.e., the enacted curriculum). A materials analysis of reading comprehension lessons (N = 80) in eight textbooks for grades 4 and 5 was complemented with semi-structured teacher interviews (N = 29) and lesson observations (N = 11), with a focus on the quality of reading strategy and text structure instruction in the curriculum. Main findings are (1) a lack of alignment between lesson goals, theory, and assignments, (2) a strong focus on practicing strategies, (3) limited declarative knowledge about strategies and text structure, (4) little opportunities for self-regulated strategy application. The teachers that were interviewed mention similar problems, but still hardly deviate from the textbook’s content and pedagogical guidelines. We make recommendations to improve the quality of the curriculum.