The construct validity of the Dutch personality inventory for DSM-5 personality disorders (PID-5) in a clinical sample

The factor structure and the convergent validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), a self-report questionnaire designed to measure personality pathology as advocated in the fifth edition, Section III of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), are already demonstrated in general population samples, but need replication in clinical samples. In 240 Flemish inpatients, we examined the factor structure of the PID-5 by means of exploratory structural equation modeling. Additionally, we investigated differences in PID-5 higher order domain scores according to gend... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Bastiaens, Tim
Claes, Laurence
Dirk, Smits
De Clercq, Barbara
De Fruyt, Filip
Rossi, Gina
Vanwalleghem, Dominique
Vermote, Rudi
Lowyck, Benedicte
Claes, Stephan
De Hert, Marc
Dokumenttyp: journalarticle
Erscheinungsdatum: 2016
Schlagwörter: Social Sciences / PATHOLOGICAL PERSONALITY / TRAIT MODEL / PSYCHOPATHOLOGY-5 PSY-5 / GENERAL PERSONALITY / DIMENSIONAL MODELS / MALADAPTIVE TRAITS / FIT INDEXES / IV / CULTURES / AGE / PID-5 / personality disorders / personality traits / DSM-5 / assessment
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26675508
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/7280701

The factor structure and the convergent validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), a self-report questionnaire designed to measure personality pathology as advocated in the fifth edition, Section III of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), are already demonstrated in general population samples, but need replication in clinical samples. In 240 Flemish inpatients, we examined the factor structure of the PID-5 by means of exploratory structural equation modeling. Additionally, we investigated differences in PID-5 higher order domain scores according to gender, age and educational level, and explored convergent and discriminant validity by relating the PID-5 with the Dimensional Assessment of Personality PathologyBasic Questionnaire and by comparing PID-5 scores of inpatients with and without a DSM-IV categorical personality disorder diagnosis. Our results confirmed the original five-factor structure of the PID-5. The reliability and the convergent and discriminant validity of the PID-5 proved to be adequate. Implications for future research are discussed.