The Utopia of Legality: A Comparison of the Dutch and Polish Approaches to the Regulation of the COVID-19 Pandemic
The description of the pandemic situation in the Netherlands and Poland was updated until 1st of June, 2022. ; This paper provides a comparison of the regulation of the pandemic in the Netherlands and Poland in order to determine whether a country with a high level of adherence to the rule of law in normal circumstances would also maintain this adherence in exceptional circumstances to a greater degree than a country with an initially lower level of adherence. The central questions posed in the paper are the following: what is the role of the rule of law in regulating the pandemic in the Nethe... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | Artikel |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2022 |
Verlag/Hrsg.: |
Faculty of Law
University of Białystok; Temida 2 |
Schlagwörter: | legality / pandemic regulations / restrictions on fundamental rights and freedoms / the rule of law / utopia |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26673863 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | http://hdl.handle.net/11320/13491 |
The description of the pandemic situation in the Netherlands and Poland was updated until 1st of June, 2022. ; This paper provides a comparison of the regulation of the pandemic in the Netherlands and Poland in order to determine whether a country with a high level of adherence to the rule of law in normal circumstances would also maintain this adherence in exceptional circumstances to a greater degree than a country with an initially lower level of adherence. The central questions posed in the paper are the following: what is the role of the rule of law in regulating the pandemic in the Netherlands and Poland? Is it true that the Dutch government was more successful in preserving legality than its Polish counterpart. By comparing the regulations in the two countries, the paper explores what role the rule of law – in particular, the principle of legality – may play in a crisis situation like this. According to Carl Schmitt, in a state of emergency, order has to be restored first before a return to the ‘normal’ legal order is possible. Does the regulation of the COVID-19 pandemic in the two countries confirm Schmitt’s claim or not? ; The writing of this chapter was funded by the National Science Centre, Poland, according to Decision no. 2017/27/B/HS5/01053. ; Bart van Klink - b.van.klink@vu.nl ; Marta Soniewicka - marta.soniewicka@uj.edu.pl ; Leon van den Broeke - c.vanden.broeke@vu.nl ; Bart van Klink – Professor of Legal Methodology at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands. He is co-editor-in-chief of the international journal Law and Method and director of the research programme Boundaries of Law. His research interests include the fact-value distinction in multidisciplinary research, symbolic legislation and contemporary challenges to the rule of law, such as populism and the pandemic. Currently, he is working, as part of the research group Societas Im/perfecta, on the role of utopia in law and politics. ; Marta Soniewicka – University Professor at the Department of Philosophy of Law and Legal Ethics, ...