Medical disciplinary jurisprudence in alleged malpractice in radiology:10-year Dutch experience
Purpose To systematically investigate the frequency and types of allegations related to radiology practice handled by the Dutch Medical Disciplinary Court in the past 10 years. Methods The Dutch Medical Disciplinary Court database was searched for verdicts concerning radiology practice between 2010 and 2019. The association between the number of verdicts and time (years) was assessed by Spearman's rho. Other data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results There were 48 verdicts (mean 4.8 per year). There was no significant association between the number of verdicts and time (Spearma... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | Artikel |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2020 |
Reihe/Periodikum: | Kwee , R M & Kwee , T C 2020 , ' Medical disciplinary jurisprudence in alleged malpractice in radiology : 10-year Dutch experience ' , European Radiology , vol. 30 , no. 6 , pp. 3507-3515 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06685-0 |
Schlagwörter: | Medical errors / Diagnostic errors / Malpractice / Radiology / Jurisprudence / PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY / DEFENSIVE MEDICINE / UNITED-STATES / USA-RATES / SUITS / CLAIMS / ERROR / RISK |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26671600 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://hdl.handle.net/11370/b6b820e2-ddb9-49e6-81d4-072cac7a5ecb |