Patient experiences with family medicine:A longitudinal study after the Dutch health care reforms in 2006

Background: In 2006 The Dutch Health Care system changed to a market oriented system. The GP remuneration changed from ± 2/3 capitation patients and 1/3 private patients before 2006 to a mixed payment scheme. From 2006 onward every patient was insured and the GP received partly capitation, partly fees for consultations and for specific services. This change coincided with many other organisational changes in General Practice care. Our research question was if during the years after 2006 patient experiences of Dutch family practice had changed. We also wanted to explore the influence of patient... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Van Den Hombergh, Pieter
Van Doorn-Klomberg, Arna
Campbell, Stephen
Wensing, Michel
Braspenning, Jozé
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2016
Reihe/Periodikum: Van Den Hombergh , P , Van Doorn-Klomberg , A , Campbell , S , Wensing , M & Braspenning , J 2016 , ' Patient experiences with family medicine : A longitudinal study after the Dutch health care reforms in 2006 ' , BMC Family Practice , vol. 17 , no. 1 , 118 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0519-7
Schlagwörter: Health care reform / Investment in Family Medicine / Patient experience / Payment system / Practice performance / Primary care / Quality of care
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26664815
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/0c62ee05-caca-4c91-99a6-d125721ed7b3

Background: In 2006 The Dutch Health Care system changed to a market oriented system. The GP remuneration changed from ± 2/3 capitation patients and 1/3 private patients before 2006 to a mixed payment scheme. From 2006 onward every patient was insured and the GP received partly capitation, partly fees for consultations and for specific services. This change coincided with many other organisational changes in General Practice care. Our research question was if during the years after 2006 patient experiences of Dutch family practice had changed. We also wanted to explore the influence of patient and practice characteristics on patient experiences. Data on patient experiences were available from 2007 to 2012. Method: In a series of annual cross sectional patient surveys the performance of GPs and practices was measured. Patient sampling took place as a part of the Dutch accreditation program in 1657 practices involving 2966 GPs. Patients' experiences, gender, age, health status, and number of annual consultations were documented as well as the type and location of practices. Linear regression analysis was used to examine time trends in patient experiences and the impact of patient and practice characteristics. Results: 78,985 patients assessed the performance of 2966 GPs, and 45,773 patients assessed the organisation of 1657 practices. The number of patients with positive experiences increased significantly between 2007 and 2012; respectively 4.8 % for GPs (beta 0.20 and p <0.0001) and 6.6 % for practices (beta 0.10, p <0.004). Higher age, having no chronic illness, more frequent consultations and attending single-handed practices, predicted better patient experiences. Conclusions: In our evaluation of patient experiences with general practice care from 2007 to 2012 we found an increase of 4.8 % for GPs and 6.6 % for practices respectively. This improvement is significant. While no direct causation can be made, possible explanations may be found in the various reforms in Dutch family practice since 2006. More ...