Comparison of indispensability and comprehensiveness results of the 1 st and 2 nd Delphi round (revised EPAs only).

The proportion of panellists who rated each of the 5 Likert scale points for ‘Indispensability’ (‘none’, ‘low’, ‘medium’, ‘high’, ‘very high’) for the four revised EPAs as well as ‘Comprehensiveness*’ (‘strongly disagree’, ‘disagree’,’ neither disagree nor agree’, ‘agree’, ‘strongly agree’) of the set as a whole in round 2 (-R2) are shown compared to their results of the 1 st round. The dotted red line shows the threshold value of 80%, all ratings to the left of this line should either be ‘high/agree’ (light green) or ‘very high/strongly agree’ (dark green) to indicate sufficient content valid... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Marije P. Hennus (6636773)
Anneliese Nusmeier (10325950)
Gwen G. M. van Heesch (10325953)
Maaike A. Riedijk (10325956)
Nikki J. Schoenmaker (10325959)
Marijn Soeteman (10325962)
Enno D. Wildschut (6939266)
Tim Fawns (4670755)
Olle Ten Cate (10325965)
Dokumenttyp: Image
Erscheinungsdatum: 2021
Schlagwörter: Biophysics / Biochemistry / Medicine / Developmental Biology / Science Policy / Infectious Diseases / Biological Sciences not elsewhere classified / PICU fellowship program directors / task force members / EPA / Delphi study Entrustable / round / PICU physicians / Dutch PICU fellows / content validity index / CVI / Dutch PICU physicians
Sprache: unknown
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26662128
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248565.g005