Highly esteemed science:An analysis of attitudes towards and perceived attributes of science in letters to the editor in two Dutch newspapers

Understanding attitudes towards science is crucial to safeguard the future of science, the application of its results and the inclusivity of decision-making processes related to science and technology. Most studies focus on attributes of social groups to explain attitudes towards science. In this study, we aim to move the discussion forward by focusing on perceived attributes of science itself by analysing over 300 letters to the editor in two Dutch national newspapers. The authors of these letters express a large degree of trust in science as a source of societal progress, if research is cond... Mehr ...

Verfasser: De Jong, S.P.L.
Ketting, Elena
van Drooge, Leonie
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2019
Reihe/Periodikum: De Jong , S P L , Ketting , E & van Drooge , L 2019 , ' Highly esteemed science : An analysis of attitudes towards and perceived attributes of science in letters to the editor in two Dutch newspapers ' , Public Understanding of Science . https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0963662519878988
Schlagwörter: academic autonomy / attitudes towards science / attributes of science / conflicts of interest / content analysis / letters to the editor / organization of science
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26634983
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://pure.knaw.nl/portal/en/publications/1ed4e8a3-abeb-48e8-bd30-61486ef9b423

Understanding attitudes towards science is crucial to safeguard the future of science, the application of its results and the inclusivity of decision-making processes related to science and technology. Most studies focus on attributes of social groups to explain attitudes towards science. In this study, we aim to move the discussion forward by focusing on perceived attributes of science itself by analysing over 300 letters to the editor in two Dutch national newspapers. The authors of these letters express a large degree of trust in science as a source of societal progress, if research is conducted according to a specific set of rules. Yet, they believe that these rules are under attack. The interests of universities as organizations and individual academics as well as the involvement of industry and government in research are perceived as conflicting with these rules. We conclude with recommendations for further research and practice.