Increased risk of aseptic loosening for posterior stabilized compared with posterior cruciate-retaining uncemented total knee replacements: a cohort study of 13,667 knees from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry
Background and purpose: While registry studies have suggested a higher risk of revision for posterior-stabilized (PS) compared with posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee replacements (TKR) using cement, it is unknown whether this is also the case for uncemented TKR. We aimed to compare the revision rates of PS and CR designs in patients receiving primary uncemented TKR. Patients and methods: Data from the Dutch arthroplasty register (LROI) was analyzed, comprising 12,226 uncemented primary CR TKRs and 750 uncemented PS TKRs registered between 2007 and 2022. Competing risk and multivaria... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | Artikel |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2023 |
Reihe/Periodikum: | Acta Orthopaedica, Vol 94 (2023) |
Verlag/Hrsg.: |
Medical Journals Sweden
|
Schlagwörter: | Cementless / Cruciate-retaining / Posterior stabilized / Registry study / Revision / Total Knee Replacement / Orthopedic surgery / RD701-811 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26630785 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2023.33283 |