Implant survival of total elbow arthroplasty: analysis of 514 cases from the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry

Aims: The aim of this study is to report the implant survival and factors associated with revision of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) using data from the Dutch national registry. Methods: All TEAs recorded in the Dutch national registry between 2014 and 2020 were included. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and a logistic regression model was used to assess the factors associated with revision. Results: A total of 514 TEAs were included, of which 35 were revised. The five-year implant survival was 91%. Male sex, a higher BMI, and previous surgery to the same elbow showed a... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Arno A. Macken
Ante Prkić
Iris van Oost
Anneke Spekenbrink-Spooren
Bertram The
Denise Eygendaal
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2023
Reihe/Periodikum: Bone & Joint Open, Vol 4, Iss 2, Pp 110-119 (2023)
Verlag/Hrsg.: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
Schlagwörter: total elbow arthroplasty / implant survival / revision / national registry / infection / loosening / re-revision / total elbow arthroplasties / arthroplasty registry / elbows / logistic regression analysis / higher bmi / revision of total elbow arthroplasty / survival analysis / kaplan-meier method / infections / obesity / Orthopedic surgery / RD701-811
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26630771
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.42.BJO-2022-0152.R1

Aims: The aim of this study is to report the implant survival and factors associated with revision of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) using data from the Dutch national registry. Methods: All TEAs recorded in the Dutch national registry between 2014 and 2020 were included. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and a logistic regression model was used to assess the factors associated with revision. Results: A total of 514 TEAs were included, of which 35 were revised. The five-year implant survival was 91%. Male sex, a higher BMI, and previous surgery to the same elbow showed a statistically significant association with revision (p < 0.036). Of the 35 revised implants, ten (29%) underwent a second revision. Conclusion: This study reports a five-year implant survival of TEA of 91%. Patient factors associated with revision are defined and can be used to optimize informed consent and shared decision-making. There was a high rate of secondary revisions. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(2):110–119.