Referral rate, profile and degree of control of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: data from a single lipid unit from a Mediterranean area

Abstract Background The challenging rigorous management of hypercholesterolemia promotes referral to specialized units. This study explored the need, based on referral rate and cardiovascular (CV) risk factor control in patients evaluated for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), for a lipid unit (LU). Methods Over a four-year period, 340 referrals to our unit were analyzed to establish the lipid disorder referral rate. Moreover, 118 patients referred for potential FH during the period 2010–2018 (52.4 ± 13.9 years, 47.5% male, Caucasian, 26.3% obese, 33.1% smokers and 51.7% with some glycaemic a... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Enric Serra-Planas
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2023
Reihe/Periodikum: Lipids in Health and Disease, Vol 22, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2023)
Verlag/Hrsg.: BMC
Schlagwörter: Familial hypercholesterolemia / Dutch lipid clinic network score / Lipoprotein (a) / Lipid Unit / Nutritional diseases. Deficiency diseases / RC620-627
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26627820
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-023-01815-1

Abstract Background The challenging rigorous management of hypercholesterolemia promotes referral to specialized units. This study explored the need, based on referral rate and cardiovascular (CV) risk factor control in patients evaluated for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), for a lipid unit (LU). Methods Over a four-year period, 340 referrals to our unit were analyzed to establish the lipid disorder referral rate. Moreover, 118 patients referred for potential FH during the period 2010–2018 (52.4 ± 13.9 years, 47.5% male, Caucasian, 26.3% obese, 33.1% smokers and 51.7% with some glycaemic alteration) were investigated. The Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) score, type and dose of lipid-lowering drugs, lipid profile including lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) and the presence of plaques with carotid ultrasound (CU) were recorded. Results Lipids represented 6.2% of referrals (38 patient-years) requiring a 2–3 h weekly monographic outpatient consultation. The potential FH sample displayed a DLCN score ≥ 6 in 78% and modifiable CV risk factors in 51%. Only 22% achieved tight disease control despite intensive treatment. The statin-ezetimibe combination treatment group achieved better goals (73.0% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.003), and the rosuvastatin group had a higher proportion of prediabetes (60.9% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.037). Neither CU plaque presence nor Lp(a) > 50 mg/dL was linked with established CV disease patients, but higher Lp(a) concentrations were detected between them (102.5 (26.3–145.8) vs. 25.0 (13.0–52.0) mg/dL, P = 0.012). Conclusions The referral rate, degree of control, and proportion of modifiable CV risk factors in FH patients demonstrate the need for LU in our area as well as optimize control and treatment.