After Zigzagging Between Extremes, Finally Common Sense? Will Belgium Return to Reasonable Rules on Illegally Obtained Evidence?

In the absence of statutory rules on the matter, Belgian courts traditionally applied a strict exclusionary rule for illegally gathered evidence and its fruits. The Court of Cassation in 2003 made a spectacular U-turn and prohibited exclusion of illegally obtained evidence by criminal courts, with only very limited exceptions. Parliament subsequently incorporated these judge-made principles into a binding statutory rule. As a new Code is about to be debated in Parliament, the time is right to question the “normalisation” of law enforcement officers’ disrespect for the rules. The Rule of Law wi... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Frank Verbruggen
Charlotte Conings
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2021
Reihe/Periodikum: Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, Vol 7, Iss 1 (2021)
Verlag/Hrsg.: Instituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal
Schlagwörter: illegally obtained evidence / admissibility / fair trial / exclusionary rule / codification / Law / K
Sprache: Englisch
Spanish
Italian
Portuguese
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26613631
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.500