Epidemiology of disorders of gut-brain interaction in Belgium and differences between two language groups:results from the Rome foundation global epidemiology study

Background: The Rome Foundation carried out a worldwide epidemiology study on DGBI according to the Rome IV criteria in 33 countries, including Belgium. DGBI prevalence varied between continents and countries, but prevalence differences within language groups in a single country have not yet been described. Methods: We analyzed the prevalence rates of 18 DGBI and their psychosocial impact in Belgium in the French and Dutch language groups. Key Results: DGBI prevalence was similar in the French-speaking and Dutch-speaking population. Having one or more DGBI was negatively associated with psycho... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Broeders, Bert
Devolder, Elise
Jones, Michael
Simrén, Magnus
Bangdiwala, Shrikant I.
Sperber, Ami D.
Palsson, Olafur S.
Tack, Jan
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2023
Reihe/Periodikum: Broeders , B , Devolder , E , Jones , M , Simrén , M , Bangdiwala , S I , Sperber , A D , Palsson , O S & Tack , J 2023 , ' Epidemiology of disorders of gut-brain interaction in Belgium and differences between two language groups : results from the Rome foundation global epidemiology study ' , Neurogastroenterology and Motility , vol. 35 , no. 6 , e14588 , pp. 1-11 . https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14588
Schlagwörter: Belgium / disorders of gut-brain interaction / Dutch-and French-speaking population / epidemiology / functional dyspepsia / irritable bowel syndrome / Rome IV diagnostic criteria
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26583394
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/publications/ca164c7a-7194-4a58-840a-0e377dd2f93e

Background: The Rome Foundation carried out a worldwide epidemiology study on DGBI according to the Rome IV criteria in 33 countries, including Belgium. DGBI prevalence varied between continents and countries, but prevalence differences within language groups in a single country have not yet been described. Methods: We analyzed the prevalence rates of 18 DGBI and their psychosocial impact in Belgium in the French and Dutch language groups. Key Results: DGBI prevalence was similar in the French-speaking and Dutch-speaking population. Having one or more DGBI was negatively associated with psychosocial well-being. The scores for depression were lower in the Dutch-speaking participants with one or more DGBI compared to the French-speaking participants. Interestingly, we also found significantly lower scores in the general Dutch-speaking versus the French-speaking population for depression and non-gastrointesinal somatic symptoms, and higher global physical health and mental health quality-of-life component scores. In the Dutch-speaking group, medication use for gastric acid was lower, but use of prescribed analgesics was more common. Nevertheless, the use of non-prescribed pain medication was higher in the French-speaking group. Anxiety and sleep medication use was also higher in the latter group. Conclusions & Interferences: The results of this first in-depth analysis of Rome IV DGBI in Belgium show a higher prevalence for some DGBI in the French-speaking cohort, and a larger associated disease burden. These differences between language/culture groups in the same country support the psychosocial pathophysiological model of DGBI.