Classe inversée en enseignement supérieur et dynamique d’élaboration du savoir : le point de vue des enseignants

Following the development of information technologies, higher education is evolving towards hybrid devices with the flipped classroom. This article reports on research that attempts to perceive differentiated repositioning of space-time and actors in the flipped classroom. We interviewed nine higher education teachers in Belgium (French-speaking part) who call themselves “inverters". The study of the reasons that led these teachers to opt for the flipped classroom system highlights the importance of personal experiences as well as the existence of differences in interactions with students. The... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Dorothée Baillet
Françoise Robin
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2022
Reihe/Periodikum: Recherches en Éducation, Vol 46 (2022)
Verlag/Hrsg.: Nantes Université
Schlagwörter: pedagogy: methods and tools / change and innovation / higher and university education / Belgium / autonomy and socialization / ICT and digital / Education / L
Sprache: Französisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26582946
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://doi.org/10.4000/ree.10120

Following the development of information technologies, higher education is evolving towards hybrid devices with the flipped classroom. This article reports on research that attempts to perceive differentiated repositioning of space-time and actors in the flipped classroom. We interviewed nine higher education teachers in Belgium (French-speaking part) who call themselves “inverters". The study of the reasons that led these teachers to opt for the flipped classroom system highlights the importance of personal experiences as well as the existence of differences in interactions with students. These results, coupled with the analysis of the implementation of the system through the didactic triplet (Sensevy, 2011), have brought to light two ideal-types. The first is characterized by the teacher's control over the entire system or the devolution of the advancement of knowledge to the students. The second alternates control and devolution.