Phenology of wing wear of peacock butterflies in Belgium 2009–2020

We derived voltinism from wing wear. We classified the condition of wear of the upperwings in 12,425 butterflies according to four categories: (1) immaculate: fresh, or with at most one tiny scratch on the upper wings or one minor dent to the wing edges, (2) slightly worn: some scratches on the upper wing and/or small dents to the edges, (3) moderately worn: many scratches to the upper wing and/or dented edges, and (4) heavily worn: (parts with) colors faded and/or heavily dented edges. The categories were chosen to allow the distinction of recently emerged individuals in particular: there is... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Herremans, Marc
Gielen, Karin
Van Kerckhoven, Jos
Vanormelingen, Pieter
Veraghtert, Wim
Swinnen, Kristijn RR
Maes, Dirk
Dokumenttyp: other
Erscheinungsdatum: 2021
Schlagwörter: peacock butterfly / Aglais io / life history strategy / citizen science / change in voltinism / bivoltine / Belgium / climate change
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26580947
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://zenodo.org/record/5138012

We derived voltinism from wing wear. We classified the condition of wear of the upperwings in 12,425 butterflies according to four categories: (1) immaculate: fresh, or with at most one tiny scratch on the upper wings or one minor dent to the wing edges, (2) slightly worn: some scratches on the upper wing and/or small dents to the edges, (3) moderately worn: many scratches to the upper wing and/or dented edges, and (4) heavily worn: (parts with) colors faded and/or heavily dented edges. The categories were chosen to allow the distinction of recently emerged individuals in particular: there is “more wear” between categories 3 and 4 than between the first two. Persistent wear and abrasions with multiple impacts at several spots was given more weight in the classification than a single major incident that resulted in larger parts of the wing missing. Pictures were randomly sorted before being classified by a volunteer (JVK), who worked from a series of reference examples.