Current Status of Livelihood, Job Satisfaction and Well-being of inland Fishermen in Southern Benin ; Belgique

In southern Benin, the majority of the populations of the communes of So-Ava, Aguégués, Comè, and Grand-Popo are professional fishermen, given the time they spend fishing in the large areas of water crossing those communes. The evolution of fishing across generations of the ever-growing population has undoubtedly led to changes in the ability of fishermen to meet sustainably their needs. Based on this hypothesis, this study attempts to establish a link between the livelihoods held by fishers and the job satisfaction and well-being of the latter, to explain their motivations to remain in the in... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Kpanou, Sètondji Ben-Vital Kolawolé
Dedehouanou, Houinsou
Kpenavoun Chogoun, Sylvain
AOUDJI, K. N. Augustin
Dogot, Thomas
Dokumenttyp: lecture
Erscheinungsdatum: 2020
Schlagwörter: Inland fisheries / livelihoods / job satisfaction / and well-being / governance / Southern Benin / Life sciences / Agriculture & agronomy / Sciences du vivant / Agriculture & agronomie
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-26551606
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/250546

In southern Benin, the majority of the populations of the communes of So-Ava, Aguégués, Comè, and Grand-Popo are professional fishermen, given the time they spend fishing in the large areas of water crossing those communes. The evolution of fishing across generations of the ever-growing population has undoubtedly led to changes in the ability of fishermen to meet sustainably their needs. Based on this hypothesis, this study attempts to establish a link between the livelihoods held by fishers and the job satisfaction and well-being of the latter, to explain their motivations to remain in the industry. For this purpose, a stratified sample of 205 fishermen was interviewed using a structured questionnaire. The results show 4 categories of fishermen with different characteristics. The first category comprises extensive subsistence fishermen (65%) and semi-intensive sedentary fishermen (35%) with relatively low livelihoods but satisfied with their work and well-being as fishermen. On the other side, the fourth category is made up of sedentary intensive fishers (100%) with the highest livelihoods but dissatisfied with their work and welfare as fishers. These results raise the need to consider the non-economic motivations of fishers in the design of inland fisheries governance arrangements.