1.
Cost-effectiveness plane reflecting the probability that blended ACT is cost-effective compared to CBT in terms of QALYs (cost-utility).
Acceptability curve reflecting the probability that blended ACT is cost-effective compared to CBT in terms of QALYs (cost-utility) at different willingness-to-pay ceilings.
Baseline characteristics of study sample.
Mean costs and outcomes by condition over assessments.
Result of the main analyses (cost-effectiveness and cost-utility) and sensitivity analyses.
Differential item functioning graphs.
2.
3.
Data material.
Item threshold map of the BAT12 items and thresholds ordering on a logit scale (higher value indicates higher burnout) of the Burnout Assessment Tool.
The item characteristic curve of item MD1 (I struggle to find any enthusiasm for my work)) for men and women.
Fig 3 -