1.

A scatter plot of FTIR-ATR predicted values (instrument response) versus real (known) stearic acid share values using the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 11281 cm -1...

2.

A scatter plot of FTIR-ATR predicted values (instrument response) versus real (known) stearic acid share values using the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 11281 cm -1...

3.

A scatter plot of FTIR-ATR predicted values (instrument response) versus real (known) stearic acid share values using the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 11281 cm -1...

1.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

2.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

3.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

1.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

2.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

3.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

1.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

2.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

3.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

1.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

2.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

3.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

1.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

2.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

3.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

1.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

2.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

3.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

1.

Diagnosis (N) per month between March 2020 and March 2021.

2.

Diagnosis (N) per month between March 2020 and March 2021.

3.

Diagnosis (N) per month between March 2020 and March 2021.

1.

Number of episodes per city between March 2020 and March 2021.

2.

Number of episodes per city between March 2020 and March 2021.

3.

Number of episodes per city between March 2020 and March 2021.

1.

Baseline characteristics of study population and diagnosis groups.

2.

Baseline characteristics of study population and diagnosis groups.

3.

Baseline characteristics of study population and diagnosis groups.