1.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1171 cm -1 .

2.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1171 cm -1 .

3.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1171 cm -1 .

4.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1171 cm -1 .

5.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1171 cm -1 .

6.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1171 cm -1 .

1.

Prediction performance parameters of the calibration curve constructed for determination of the stearic acid share in beeswax: A scatter plot of FTIR-ATR predicted values (instrume...

2.

Prediction performance parameters of the calibration curve constructed for determination of the stearic acid share in beeswax: A scatter plot of FTIR-ATR predicted values (instrume...

3.

Prediction performance parameters of the calibration curve constructed for determination of the stearic acid share in beeswax: A scatter plot of FTIR-ATR predicted values (instrume...

4.

Prediction performance parameters of the calibration curve constructed for determination of the stearic acid share in beeswax: A scatter plot of FTIR-ATR predicted values (instrume...

5.

Prediction performance parameters of the calibration curve constructed for determination of the stearic acid share in beeswax: A scatter plot of FTIR-ATR predicted values (instrume...

6.

Prediction performance parameters of the calibration curve constructed for determination of the stearic acid share in beeswax: A scatter plot of FTIR-ATR predicted values (instrume...

1.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1710 cm -1 .

2.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1710 cm -1 .

3.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1710 cm -1 .

4.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1710 cm -1 .

5.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1710 cm -1 .

6.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1710 cm -1 .

1.

A scatter plot of FTIR-ATR predicted values (instrument response) versus real (known) stearic acid share values using the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 11281 cm -1...

2.

A scatter plot of FTIR-ATR predicted values (instrument response) versus real (known) stearic acid share values using the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 11281 cm -1...

3.

A scatter plot of FTIR-ATR predicted values (instrument response) versus real (known) stearic acid share values using the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 11281 cm -1...

4.

A scatter plot of FTIR-ATR predicted values (instrument response) versus real (known) stearic acid share values using the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 11281 cm -1...

5.

A scatter plot of FTIR-ATR predicted values (instrument response) versus real (known) stearic acid share values using the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 11281 cm -1...

6.

A scatter plot of FTIR-ATR predicted values (instrument response) versus real (known) stearic acid share values using the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 11281 cm -1...

1.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

2.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

3.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

4.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

5.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

6.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

1.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

2.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

3.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

4.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

5.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

6.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

1.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

2.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

3.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

4.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

5.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

6.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

1.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

2.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

3.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

4.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

5.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

6.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

1.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

2.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

3.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

4.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

5.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

6.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

1.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

2.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

3.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

4.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

5.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

6.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.