1.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

2.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

3.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

4.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

5.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

6.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

7.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

8.

Residuals of FTIR-ATR prediction in the spectral region with an absorption maximum at 1281 cm -1 .

1.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

2.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

3.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

4.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

5.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

6.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

7.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

8.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Paraffin-adulterated beeswax sam...

1.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

2.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

3.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

4.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

5.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

6.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

7.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

8.

Adulterated beeswax samples versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection: Stearic acid—adulterated beeswax...

1.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

2.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

3.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

4.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

5.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

6.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

7.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

8.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

1.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

2.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

3.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

4.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

5.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

6.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

7.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

8.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

1.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

2.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

3.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

4.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

5.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

6.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

7.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

8.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

1.

Graphical representation of interaction effects in these study.

2.

Graphical representation of interaction effects in these study.

3.

Graphical representation of interaction effects in these study.

1.

Overview of participation and drop-out rates.

2.

Overview of participation and drop-out rates.

3.

Overview of participation and drop-out rates.

1.

Overview of subdivisions per CSC for municipality size, implementation strategy and recruitment strategy.

2.

Overview of subdivisions per CSC for municipality size, implementation strategy and recruitment strategy.

3.

Overview of subdivisions per CSC for municipality size, implementation strategy and recruitment strategy.

1.

Scores for physical activity behavior, health-related quality of life, motivation, and health-related fitness for drop-outs and remaining participants (means and standard deviation...

2.

Scores for physical activity behavior, health-related quality of life, motivation, and health-related fitness for drop-outs and remaining participants (means and standard deviation...

3.

Scores for physical activity behavior, health-related quality of life, motivation, and health-related fitness for drop-outs and remaining participants (means and standard deviation...