1.
BRIEF CONSIDERATIONS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ROMANIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, THE STRASBOURG COURT AND THE LUXEMBOURG COURT
2.
Mugemangango t. België (EHRM (GK), nr. 310/15) – Verkiezingsgeschil:Mag het parlement zelf beslissen?
Basra v. Belgium : a structural problem struck from the list
A serious case of Strasbourg-bashing?: An evaluation of the debates on the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights in the Netherlands
Jaloud v Netherlands and Hassan v United Kingdom: time for a principled approach in the application of the ECHR to military action abroad
Reflections on Jaloud v. the Netherlands: Jurisdictional Consequences and Resonance in Dutch Society
3.
4.
5.
HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION. CONFLICT BETWEEN THE LUXEMBOURG AND STRASBOURG COURTS REGARDING INTERPRETATION OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS* ; DERECH...
DERECHOS HUMANOS EN LA UNIÓN EUROPEA. CONFLICTO ENTRE LAS CORTES DE LUXEMBURGO Y ESTRASBURGO EN LA INTERPRETACIÓN DEL ARTÍCULO 8 DE LA CONVENCIÓN EUROPEA SOBRE DERECHOS HUMANOS ; H...
A Mugemangango v. Belgium Sequel in the Making
Adjudicating the Public Interest in Immigration Law:A Systematic Content Analysis of Strasbourg and Luxembourg Case Law on Legal Restrictions to Immigration and Free Movement