1.

Survivorship profile based on percentage of fused long bones, for Polderweg Period 1 (n = 227), De Bruin Period 1 (n = 32), De Bruin Period 2 (n = 51), and De Bruin Period 4 (n = 2...

2.

Survivorship profile based on percentage of fused long bones, for Polderweg Period 1 (n = 227), De Bruin Period 1 (n = 32), De Bruin Period 2 (n = 51), and De Bruin Period 4 (n = 2...

3.

Survivorship profile based on percentage of fused long bones, for Polderweg Period 1 (n = 227), De Bruin Period 1 (n = 32), De Bruin Period 2 (n = 51), and De Bruin Period 4 (n = 2...

4.

Survivorship profile based on percentage of fused long bones, for Polderweg Period 1 (n = 227), De Bruin Period 1 (n = 32), De Bruin Period 2 (n = 51), and De Bruin Period 4 (n = 2...

1.

Survivorship profile based on tooth wear, for Polderweg period 1 (n = 39), De Bruin period 1 (n = 7), De Bruin period 2 (n = 6), and period 4 (n = 5).

2.

Survivorship profile based on tooth wear, for Polderweg period 1 (n = 39), De Bruin period 1 (n = 7), De Bruin period 2 (n = 6), and period 4 (n = 5).

3.

Survivorship profile based on tooth wear, for Polderweg period 1 (n = 39), De Bruin period 1 (n = 7), De Bruin period 2 (n = 6), and period 4 (n = 5).

4.

Survivorship profile based on tooth wear, for Polderweg period 1 (n = 39), De Bruin period 1 (n = 7), De Bruin period 2 (n = 6), and period 4 (n = 5).

1.

Scatterplot showing δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of suids from Polderweg (solid) and De Buin (pattern) per occupational period.

2.

Scatterplot showing δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of suids from Polderweg (solid) and De Buin (pattern) per occupational period.

3.

Scatterplot showing δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of suids from Polderweg (solid) and De Buin (pattern) per occupational period.

4.

Scatterplot showing δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of suids from Polderweg (solid) and De Buin (pattern) per occupational period.

1.

Scatterplot showing δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of suids per age category for both sites combined.

2.

Scatterplot showing δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of suids per age category for both sites combined.

3.

Scatterplot showing δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of suids per age category for both sites combined.

4.

Scatterplot showing δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of suids per age category for both sites combined.

1.

Scatterplot showing δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of wild fauna from Polderweg (solid) and De Bruin (pattern and dashed) per occupational period.

2.

Scatterplot showing δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of wild fauna from Polderweg (solid) and De Bruin (pattern and dashed) per occupational period.

3.

Scatterplot showing δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of wild fauna from Polderweg (solid) and De Bruin (pattern and dashed) per occupational period.

4.

Scatterplot showing δ 13 C and δ 15 N values of wild fauna from Polderweg (solid) and De Bruin (pattern and dashed) per occupational period.

1.

Chronological developments at Polderweg and De Bruin.

2.

Chronological developments at Polderweg and De Bruin.

3.

Chronological developments at Polderweg and De Bruin.

4.

Chronological developments at Polderweg and De Bruin.

1.

Occurrence and Distribution of Pharmaceuticals and Their Transformation Products in Luxembourgish Surface Waters

2.

Occurrence and Distribution of Pharmaceuticals and Their Transformation Products in Luxembourgish Surface Waters

3.

Occurrence and Distribution of Pharmaceuticals and Their Transformation Products in Luxembourgish Surface Waters

4.

Occurrence and Distribution of Pharmaceuticals and Their Transformation Products in Luxembourgish Surface Waters

1.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

2.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

3.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

4.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

5.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

6.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

7.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

8.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

9.

Selected, minimum, and maximum Manning’s coefficients [64] tested during sensitivity analysis for landcover present in the floodplain near the San Saba River, TX, U.S.A used in a 2...

1.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

2.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

3.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

4.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

5.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

6.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

7.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

8.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

9.

Average ± standard deviation of hydraulic conditions for simulated flow events at 200 sampling sites in the upper San Saba River, TX.

1.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

2.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

3.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

4.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

5.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

6.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

7.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

8.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...

9.

Estimates of median average hydraulic variables (median ± standard deviation) for 200 sites in the San Saba River, TX given minimum, selected, and maximum Manning’s coefficients fo...