1.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

2.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

3.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

4.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

5.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

6.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

7.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

8.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

9.

Comb foundation samples adulterated with stearic acid (N = 3) versus genuine beeswax (reference standard) with an emphasis on spectral regions indicative for adulteration detection...

1.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

2.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

3.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

4.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

5.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

6.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

7.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

8.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

9.

Contingency table of results for adulteration of beeswax.

1.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

2.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

3.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

4.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

5.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

6.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

7.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

8.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

9.

Univariate logistic regression analysis for adulterated versus non-adulterated Belgian beeswax samples.

1.

Cervical cancer research activity.

2.

Cervical cancer research activity.

3.

Cervical cancer research activity.

4.

Cervical cancer research activity.

5.

Cervical cancer research activity.

6.

Cervical cancer research activity.

7.

Cervical cancer research activity.

8.

Cervical cancer research activity.

9.

Cervical cancer research activity.

1.

Cervical cancer research quality as represented by citation parameters.

2.

Cervical cancer research quality as represented by citation parameters.

3.

Cervical cancer research quality as represented by citation parameters.

4.

Cervical cancer research quality as represented by citation parameters.

1.

Epidemiologic analysis of cervical cancer research.

2.

Epidemiologic analysis of cervical cancer research.

3.

Epidemiologic analysis of cervical cancer research.

4.

Epidemiologic analysis of cervical cancer research.

5.

Epidemiologic analysis of cervical cancer research.

6.

Epidemiologic analysis of cervical cancer research.

7.

Epidemiologic analysis of cervical cancer research.

8.

Epidemiologic analysis of cervical cancer research.

9.

Epidemiologic analysis of cervical cancer research.

1.

International network on cervical cancer research.

2.

International network on cervical cancer research.

3.

International network on cervical cancer research.

4.

International network on cervical cancer research.

1.

Subject areas of cervical cancer research.

2.

Subject areas of cervical cancer research.

3.

Subject areas of cervical cancer research.

4.

Subject areas of cervical cancer research.

1.

Socioeconomic analyses.

2.

Socioeconomic analyses.

3.

Socioeconomic analyses.

4.

Socioeconomic analyses.

1.

Ranking of the number of articles per Gross Expenditure on Research and Development (GERD) of publishing countries with at least 30 articles (threshold).

2.

Ranking of the number of articles per Gross Expenditure on Research and Development (GERD) of publishing countries with at least 30 articles (threshold).

3.

Ranking of the number of articles per Gross Expenditure on Research and Development (GERD) of publishing countries with at least 30 articles (threshold).

4.

Ranking of the number of articles per Gross Expenditure on Research and Development (GERD) of publishing countries with at least 30 articles (threshold).