Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Observational cohort studies have suggested that minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) is associated with better short-term outcomes compared with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP), such as less intraoperative blood loss, lower morbidity, shorter length of hospital stay, and reduced total costs. Confounding by indication has probably influenced these findings, given that case-matched studies failed to confirm the superiority of MIDP. This accentuates the need for multicenter randomized controlled trials, which are currently lacking. We hypothesize that time to functional r... Mehr ...
Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Dokumenttyp: | Artikel |
Erscheinungsdatum: | 2017 |
Schlagwörter: | Minimally invasive / Laparoscopic / Robot-assisted / Distal pancreatectomy / Pancreatic surgery / Pancreatic cancer / Hospital Costs / Humans / Clinical Protocols / Recovery of Function / Pain / Postoperative/etiology / Netherlands / Analgesics/administration & dosage / Time Factors / Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects / Eating / Administration / Oral / Treatment Outcome / Energy Intake / Pancreatectomy/adverse effects / Cost-Benefit Analysis / Laparoscopy/adverse effects / Quality of Life / Health Status / Pain Measurement / Research Design / Pharmacology (medical) / Medicine (miscellaneous) / Journal Article / Research Support / Non-U.S. Gov't / Randomized Controlled Trial / Multicenter Study / Comparative Study |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Permalink: | https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27610743 |
Datenquelle: | BASE; Originalkatalog |
Powered By: | BASE |
Link(s) : | https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/353354 |