Cost-effectiveness of low-dose colchicine in patients with chronic coronary disease in the netherlands

Abstract Aims Recent trials have shown that low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg once daily) reduces major cardiovascular events in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of low-dose colchicine therapy in patients with chronic coronary disease when added to standard background therapy. Methods and results This Markov cohort cost-effectiveness model used estimates of therapy effectiveness, transition probabilities, costs and quality of life obtained from the Low-dose Colchicine 2 (LoDoCo2) trial, as well as meta-analyses and public sources. In thi... Mehr ...

Verfasser: Fiolet, Aernoud T L
Keusters, Willem
Blokzijl, Johan
Nidorf, S Mark
Eikelboom, John W
Budgeon, Charley A
Tijssen, Jan G P
Römer, Tjeerd
Westendorp, Iris
Cornel, Jan Hein
Thompson, Peter L
Frederix, Geert W J
Mosterd, Arend
de Wit, G Ardine
Dokumenttyp: Artikel
Erscheinungsdatum: 2024
Reihe/Periodikum: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes ; ISSN 2058-5225 2058-1742
Verlag/Hrsg.: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Schlagwörter: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine / Health Policy
Sprache: Englisch
Permalink: https://search.fid-benelux.de/Record/base-27224478
Datenquelle: BASE; Originalkatalog
Powered By: BASE
Link(s) : http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae021

Abstract Aims Recent trials have shown that low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg once daily) reduces major cardiovascular events in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of low-dose colchicine therapy in patients with chronic coronary disease when added to standard background therapy. Methods and results This Markov cohort cost-effectiveness model used estimates of therapy effectiveness, transition probabilities, costs and quality of life obtained from the Low-dose Colchicine 2 (LoDoCo2) trial, as well as meta-analyses and public sources. In this trial, Low-dose colchicine was added to standard of care and compared to placebo. The main outcomes were cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, stroke and coronary revascularisation, quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), the cost per QALY gained (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio), and net monetary benefit. In the model, low-dose colchicine therapy yielded 0.04 additional QALYs compared with standard of care at an incremental cost of €455 from a societal perspective and €729 from a healthcare perspective, resulting in a cost per QALY gained of €12,176/QALY from a societal perspective and €19,499/QALY from a healthcare perspective. Net monetary benefit was €1,414 from a societal perspective and €1,140 from a healthcare perspective. Low-dose colchicine has a 96% and 94% chance of being cost effective, from respectively a societal and healthcare perspective when using a willingness to pay of €50,000/QALY. Net monetary benefit would decrease below zero when annual low-dose colchicine costs would exceed an annual cost of €221 per patient. Conclusion Adding low-dose colchicine to standard of care in patients with chronic coronary disease is cost-effective according to commonly accepted thresholds in Europe and Australia and compares favourably in cost-effectiveness to other drugs used in chronic coronary disease.